First they will remove the charging port & then they will give the Touch ID by saying , charging port was getting in the way of Touch ID š¤£ now buy our wireless charging port. Its a win win situation for them.
Touch ID is nice on my SE 3, much quicker
Guess ill be holding on to my iphone 8 plus then, don't care for face id at all. I subscribe to renee ritchys philosophy of multi forms of authentications so there's a trust threshold met for security not just one thing over the other. yea it might cost a bit more for it to be implemented but since when has apple shyed away from price increases? Just another con in the pros vs cons when buying a new iPhone i guess and I'm a long time iPhone user – 3g, 4 , 6 plus , 8plus . the total now comes to 3 cons and one positive, cons = no native xcloud/gamepass intergration , no touch id , and still stupidly expensive. the only positive i find as a long term iphone user would be the length of support of each phone you get. android here I come I guess? … and no icloud/ imessage won't keep me on apples platform
Apple can do that but the price need to be highter or maybe no box or no cable lol
I think Iād be dope if they made the apple logo on the back of iPhones into the Touch ID
But how to access the touch ID on the power button if the phone has a protective case or a silicone cover?
What watch? Is actually a good question. š
Touch ID like the iPad
I think given the variable quality of on-screen fingerprint sensors and the fact it would make the screen thicker, Apple may not offer Touch ID on the iPhone except for one specific model; the iPhone SE. And only then with an enlarged power button like what Apple did with the iPad Air and iPad Mini models.
Just use the back logo as a touch id surface. š¤·š¼āāļø
Glad! Cuz Touch ID is overrated! Face ID works like it doesnāt existing. Itās magical Not to forget itās 10x more secure
Well that sucks!
I hope they put touch ID into the power button soon because I wanna upgrade from this SE20. Not doing a notched screen
Idiot's at apple don't like that company whatsoever
We can all agree this channel is pro android. š¤·š½āāļø
Great content. Try this take an samsung phone and a Iphone, lay them both on the table flat. Then put both phones in always on display or lock screen. With out bending over just using you arm and hand open your phone. And see which is faster fingerprint scanner or punching in a pass code. Remember you can't bend over or lift the phones for face recognition. And if you have good thumb memory or at least for me I can close my eye's and still turn on my screen by using my fingerprint scanner.
The HUAWEI P40 PRO allows you to use both Face ID and optical fingerprint at the same time
Iāve had the same issue with polarized sunglasses. Even with the watch setting on for mask. Because it needs you looking at the phone to unlock and somehow canāt see through polarized lenses
They should make the Apple logo on the back have the Touch ID function.
Tbf I used to prefer Touch ID to Face ID. But since iPhone 13, Face ID is now just as quick as Touch ID and now I prefer it. Plus itās more secure. I think aswell with the introduction of dynamic island on the 14 Proās, that is solidifying Appleās commitment to continue to use the True Depth camera used for Face ID.
Apple, just make a fucken under display finger print reader, yah fucken plonkers
3D pressing an inbuilt touch id sensor would be satisfying
Apple doesn't care because they have life long customers. They could replace touch ID with broken glass that cut you each time you used it and their cult members would still line up to buy…..
What I still donāt understand after all these years is the fact that Siri is always listening should make it so they give you another option such as a specific group of words you could use to unlock your device. Like if youāre not a CIA agent and you really donāt care, or you donāt have anything on your phone that you care about your family finding out about you should be able to just say something to open your phone so you wonāt have to touch it at all. Why canāt you come up with a unique set of words such as ā the fish ate the worm and danced a jigā? So you could say āhey Siri , the fish ate the worm and danced a jigā and it would open up your device so if youāre sitting across the room from it and you want to open YouTube, you could just say those words and everything would happen automatically. Or you could even shout out a numeric pass code without having to touch your phone at all. This is one way to open up a device that I donāt think any company has done and I just donāt understand why or Iām just the only genius thatās thought of it. So if you know youāre alone in your house or whatever or you donāt care if somebody hears you say it why canāt that be available? Personally, I think the whole thing should be able to be activated with just your voice so if you had your iPad on a stand for instants on your desk, you wouldnāt even have to touch it, or have your face nearby so you could yell from across the room āheySiri , (insert magic words) open, Spotify, or play some music or open YouTube and play video from Lew Laterā. Am I wrong or is this not a good idea? Because as it stands right now, you either have to have your face right in front of it or you have to touch it. It almost warrants somebody writing a letter to Apple Inc. suggesting something like this. Or you could even have it open a specific device because often I have a problem when Iāve been using my iPad and have not even touched my phone for a while and both are in the room and I want to open the iPad and even though my face is right in front of the iPad, the phone will respond and say that you need to unlock your iPhone first and itās really irritating because I didnāt want to use the phone. I want to use the iPad and if you could shout out a set of words, you could say hey siri and have a specific set of words for your iPad as opposed to your iPhone so that would know which one youāre trying to open. So for instance, if the passcode on your iPad is 43769 you could say hey siri say those numbers and it would open your iPad instead of your iPhone. I guess I just donāt know how to do it but itās really irritating when Iām sitting right in front of my iPad and thatās what I want to open and it answers on my phone. Apple is so smart and someways, but then theyāre so dumb and other ways. Sometimes some thing that should be a complete no-brainer completely flies under their radar.
Face ID is a much more secure biometric system. As good as Appleās fingerprint sensor was, the 3D face scanner Apple uses is the most accurate and robust.
Having a Touch ID would be useless. Your face automatically does everything.
āUpgradesā from iPhone 8 to an iPhone 14 pro and Face ID is terrible. Itās borderline unusable if youāre lying down in bed and the need to constantly peer into your phoneās soul just to unlock the damn thing sucks. Oh, and because you have to flick upward every damn time to get from the lock screen to the home screen, you have to touch near the same place where the fingerprint scanner used to be.
Face ID will always be a downgrade from Touch ID, all because Apple wanted to be different and not copy the under-display readers or implement a side button.
Well, instead of having a piece of plastic where the sim used to be you can add it there apple.
Face ID is awesome
"What watch?" š¤£š¤£š¤£š¤£
Why did phone companies stop doing front facing flash??
Not even needed Face ID is already good
Just put the Touch ID on the power button like on the iPad š¤·š»āāļøā¦.and while we are at it also USB C
or at least on the SE model power button to give fresh look
You can add another face for Face ID if it doesnāt recognize you in new sunglasses. I didnāt do that and my iPhone gradually realized who I was after raising my glasses a dozen times.
Apple is just being stubborn with Touch ID. Itās on the Mini; thereās no good reason not to have it on an iPhone. People love it, itās reliable, a nice back up/alternative to Face ID- bring it back. All iPhones/pads/macs should be uniform in this way.
they should have had this as a option instead of that damn face id touch id seems faster i donāt understand why they always take shit away from the phone let us have a dam option
Face ID is ok , but it does fail occasionally , if your hat is covering a bit more of your scone than usually , it can fail , if you grow a bit more hair on your face , it can fail , if you have a mask covering a bit more face again it can fail , it can be hit and miss and with a combination of all factors , face ID is not a perfect solution . I have power button ID on my air 4 ipad , its OK , but it too can be hit and miss , I`m still preferring the old rear finger print sensor or a good quality in screen finger print sensor. One of my favourite finger print sensors on the back of a device was on the nexus 6p , your index finger just fell into the hole , by the time you pulled your phone out of your pocket the display was already unlocked , and that is pretty hard to beat . Galaxy models have a decent under screen finger ID , and snapdragon apparently supports the bigger finger print sensor under screen , but apparently most phones dont have it im guessing because it probably costs a few bucks more .
Apple wonāt do that stupid move LOLā¦the camera on face id can be used for many things while touch id only used for one thing and requre additional space plus will make it harder for consumer to choose their tempered glass unless using ultrasonic plus security ratio for face id is far higher š¤·š»
I would watch this channel more if Lu didnāt automatically default to hating on anything Apple.
Apple has a fancy name for everything even a fingerprint sensor is called Touchid
So you havenāt heard about the Samsung batteries expanding? Wow š
Touch ID coming back by 2025 on their foldable device. Or in 2024 on iPhone 16, as that would be a new iphone design. If we get nothing by 2025, then itās def canceled. iPhone SE 4 rumored for touch id
If they cannot make an under-display FP sensor that competes well with Qualcomm's ultrasonic that most Android OEMs license, then why bother? They will never pay Qualcomm as that gives money to the leading competitor. Face-ID is owned by Apple, so little, if any, patents need paying. It means fewer costs which can be passed down to the customer. Apple has learnt from the mistakes of Android OEMs, that simply buy everything off the shelf and own little with intrinsic value, that developing your own features means fewer costs long term.
I hate Face ID. bring back Touch ID
It would be 2FA on steroids
If their face ID could skip the lock screen just like on Android it would be a non issue for many users. The biggest thing I always found was that with the fingerprint scanner you went right to the home screen.
Apples desperation to stand out and look unique is the reason why we have that stupid dynamic island.
Iāve never had an issue with Face ID. Iām not sure under what scenario I would need Touch ID
First they will remove the charging port & then they will give the Touch ID by saying , charging port was getting in the way of Touch ID š¤£ now buy our wireless charging port. Its a win win situation for them.
Touch ID is nice on my SE 3, much quicker
Guess ill be holding on to my iphone 8 plus then, don't care for face id at all. I subscribe to renee ritchys philosophy of multi forms of authentications so there's a trust threshold met for security not just one thing over the other. yea it might cost a bit more for it to be implemented but since when has apple shyed away from price increases? Just another con in the pros vs cons when buying a new iPhone i guess and I'm a long time iPhone user – 3g, 4 , 6 plus , 8plus . the total now comes to 3 cons and one positive, cons = no native xcloud/gamepass intergration , no touch id , and still stupidly expensive. the only positive i find as a long term iphone user would be the length of support of each phone you get. android here I come I guess? … and no icloud/ imessage won't keep me on apples platform
Apple can do that but the price need to be highter or maybe no box or no cable lol
I think Iād be dope if they made the apple logo on the back of iPhones into the Touch ID
But how to access the touch ID on the power button if the phone has a protective case or a silicone cover?
What watch? Is actually a good question. š
Touch ID like the iPad
I think given the variable quality of on-screen fingerprint sensors and the fact it would make the screen thicker, Apple may not offer Touch ID on the iPhone except for one specific model; the iPhone SE. And only then with an enlarged power button like what Apple did with the iPad Air and iPad Mini models.
Just use the back logo as a touch id surface. š¤·š¼āāļø
Glad! Cuz Touch ID is overrated!
Face ID works like it doesnāt existing. Itās magical
Not to forget itās 10x more secure
Well that sucks!
I hope they put touch ID into the power button soon because I wanna upgrade from this SE20. Not doing a notched screen
Idiot's at apple don't like that company whatsoever
We can all agree this channel is pro android. š¤·š½āāļø
Great content. Try this take an samsung phone and a Iphone, lay them both on the table flat. Then put both phones in always on display or lock screen. With out bending over just using you arm and hand open your phone. And see which is faster fingerprint scanner or punching in a pass code. Remember you can't bend over or lift the phones for face recognition. And if you have good thumb memory or at least for me I can close my eye's and still turn on my screen by using my fingerprint scanner.
The HUAWEI P40 PRO allows you to use both Face ID and optical fingerprint at the same time
Iāve had the same issue with polarized sunglasses. Even with the watch setting on for mask. Because it needs you looking at the phone to unlock and somehow canāt see through polarized lenses
They should make the Apple logo on the back have the Touch ID function.
Tbf I used to prefer Touch ID to Face ID. But since iPhone 13, Face ID is now just as quick as Touch ID and now I prefer it. Plus itās more secure. I think aswell with the introduction of dynamic island on the 14 Proās, that is solidifying Appleās commitment to continue to use the True Depth camera used for Face ID.
Apple, just make a fucken under display finger print reader, yah fucken plonkers
3D pressing an inbuilt touch id sensor would be satisfying
Apple doesn't care because they have life long customers. They could replace touch ID with broken glass that cut you each time you used it and their cult members would still line up to buy…..
What I still donāt understand after all these years is the fact that Siri is always listening should make it so they give you another option such as a specific group of words you could use to unlock your device. Like if youāre not a CIA agent and you really donāt care, or you donāt have anything on your phone that you care about your family finding out about you should be able to just say something to open your phone so you wonāt have to touch it at all. Why canāt you come up with a unique set of words such as ā the fish ate the worm and danced a jigā? So you could say āhey Siri , the fish ate the worm and danced a jigā and it would open up your device so if youāre sitting across the room from it and you want to open YouTube, you could just say those words and everything would happen automatically. Or you could even shout out a numeric pass code without having to touch your phone at all. This is one way to open up a device that I donāt think any company has done and I just donāt understand why or Iām just the only genius thatās thought of it. So if you know youāre alone in your house or whatever or you donāt care if somebody hears you say it why canāt that be available? Personally, I think the whole thing should be able to be activated with just your voice so if you had your iPad on a stand for instants on your desk, you wouldnāt even have to touch it, or have your face nearby so you could yell from across the room āheySiri , (insert magic words) open, Spotify, or play some music or open YouTube and play video from Lew Laterā. Am I wrong or is this not a good idea? Because as it stands right now, you either have to have your face right in front of it or you have to touch it. It almost warrants somebody writing a letter to Apple Inc. suggesting something like this. Or you could even have it open a specific device because often I have a problem when Iāve been using my iPad and have not even touched my phone for a while and both are in the room and I want to open the iPad and even though my face is right in front of the iPad, the phone will respond and say that you need to unlock your iPhone first and itās really irritating because I didnāt want to use the phone. I want to use the iPad and if you could shout out a set of words, you could say hey siri and have a specific set of words for your iPad as opposed to your iPhone so that would know which one youāre trying to open. So for instance, if the passcode on your iPad is 43769 you could say hey siri say those numbers and it would open your iPad instead of your iPhone. I guess I just donāt know how to do it but itās really irritating when Iām sitting right in front of my iPad and thatās what I want to open and it answers on my phone. Apple is so smart and someways, but then theyāre so dumb and other ways. Sometimes some thing that should be a complete no-brainer completely flies under their radar.
Face ID is a much more secure biometric system. As good as Appleās fingerprint sensor was, the 3D face scanner Apple uses is the most accurate and robust.
Having a Touch ID would be useless. Your face automatically does everything.
āUpgradesā from iPhone 8 to an iPhone 14 pro and Face ID is terrible. Itās borderline unusable if youāre lying down in bed and the need to constantly peer into your phoneās soul just to unlock the damn thing sucks. Oh, and because you have to flick upward every damn time to get from the lock screen to the home screen, you have to touch near the same place where the fingerprint scanner used to be.
Face ID will always be a downgrade from Touch ID, all because Apple wanted to be different and not copy the under-display readers or implement a side button.
Well, instead of having a piece of plastic where the sim used to be you can add it there apple.
Face ID is awesome
"What watch?" š¤£š¤£š¤£š¤£
Why did phone companies stop doing front facing flash??
Not even needed Face ID is already good
Just put the Touch ID on the power button like on the iPad š¤·š»āāļøā¦.and while we are at it also USB C
or at least on the SE model power button to give fresh look
You can add another face for Face ID if it doesnāt recognize you in new sunglasses. I didnāt do that and my iPhone gradually realized who I was after raising my glasses a dozen times.
Apple is just being stubborn with Touch ID. Itās on the Mini; thereās no good reason not to have it on an iPhone. People love it, itās reliable, a nice back up/alternative to Face ID- bring it back. All iPhones/pads/macs should be uniform in this way.
they should have had this as a option instead of that damn face id touch id seems faster i donāt understand why they always take shit away from the phone let us have a dam option
Face ID is ok , but it does fail occasionally , if your hat is covering a bit more of your scone than usually , it can fail , if you grow a bit more hair on your face , it can fail , if you have a mask covering a bit more face again it can fail , it can be hit and miss and with a combination of all factors , face ID is not a perfect solution .
I have power button ID on my air 4 ipad , its OK , but it too can be hit and miss ,
I`m still preferring the old rear finger print sensor or a good quality in screen finger print sensor.
One of my favourite finger print sensors on the back of a device was on the nexus 6p , your index finger just fell into the hole , by the time you pulled your phone out of your pocket the display was already unlocked , and that is pretty hard to beat .
Galaxy models have a decent under screen finger ID , and snapdragon apparently supports the bigger finger print sensor under screen , but apparently most phones dont have it im guessing because it probably costs a few bucks more .
Apple wonāt do that stupid move LOLā¦the camera on face id can be used for many things while touch id only used for one thing and requre additional space plus will make it harder for consumer to choose their tempered glass unless using ultrasonic plus security ratio for face id is far higher š¤·š»
I would watch this channel more if Lu didnāt automatically default to hating on anything Apple.
Apple has a fancy name for everything even a fingerprint sensor is called Touchid
So you havenāt heard about the Samsung batteries expanding? Wow š
Touch ID coming back by 2025 on their foldable device. Or in 2024 on iPhone 16, as that would be a new iphone design. If we get nothing by 2025, then itās def canceled. iPhone SE 4 rumored for touch id
If they cannot make an under-display FP sensor that competes well with Qualcomm's ultrasonic that most Android OEMs license, then why bother? They will never pay Qualcomm as that gives money to the leading competitor. Face-ID is owned by Apple, so little, if any, patents need paying. It means fewer costs which can be passed down to the customer. Apple has learnt from the mistakes of Android OEMs, that simply buy everything off the shelf and own little with intrinsic value, that developing your own features means fewer costs long term.
I hate Face ID. bring back Touch ID
It would be 2FA on steroids
If their face ID could skip the lock screen just like on Android it would be a non issue for many users. The biggest thing I always found was that with the fingerprint scanner you went right to the home screen.
Apples desperation to stand out and look unique is the reason why we have that stupid dynamic island.
Iāve never had an issue with Face ID. Iām not sure under what scenario I would need Touch ID