Battlefield 5 – How Firestorm Needs to Break the Battle Royale Mode – IGN Plays Live

32 Comments

1. Why is the thumbnail not even from this game?

2. BF 1 thumbnail

3. Battlefield 5 shouldn’t of been another world war type of game. If you name a legit title like that the fans plus myself would of agreed to modern combat. I haven’t seen too much gameplay & honestly I’m not going to even buy battlefield 5. Can’t wait for the modern.

4. I played the beta it’s fun but I’ll wait till the price drops

5. They could do different types of battle royale maps and reintroduce levolution like Battle field 4. Like an underground map that is slowly collapsing around the players. Or an island with a rising storm surge in the middle of a hurricane. Or even a jungle map that is being destroyed by an erupting volcanoe. The amount of time could also vary.

6. No heals with no medic and instant death outside of the safe zone are insanely idiotic concepts. Don’t you work for IGN. Geez.

7. Sorta, kinda, maybe, a little

   Dissapointed

   Alot

8. Radical Heights used a grid system of sorts, iirc.

9. Last time I checked there wasn't a battle totaled during world war two

10. Firestorm (if done correctly) will become the quintessential squad-mode battle royale game out there.

11. Underground bunkers with supplies and if nukes drop amd poison gas well yeah

12. It already stands out…..in all the wrong ways

13. I don't like this kind of game

14. How two guys pretend to know more about Firestorm than the developers

15. Am I the only one disappointed that Firestorm isn’t available at launch.. it’ll be worth it if it has no microtransactions.

16. Did anyone get a battlefield trailer?

17. pubgs dead, move on

18. Battle royale the best game mode ever honestly every game should have one

19. Hopefully they made a 50v50 battle royale

20. #notmybattlefield

21. I was playing this game almost fell to sleep ? ?‍♂️?

22. Why are you guys still reporting on this? Let go of EA and this trash game!

23. 1 like
    
    2 subs
    
    3 i will do the same

24. I hate when people like these guys just start throwing random numbers like “it would be cool to see 200 people battling against each other”. If they even had the slightest idea of how much workload that would be for the servers and our consoles.

25. This video is the equivalent of a bunch of dudes saying “you know what would be cool” to a bunch of his friends but it’s owned my a large online gaming conglomerate so now we all have to watch this

26. Maybe just me but isn't it weird they aren't sure how many people are in a fortnite or pubg server?

27. Cool

28. "it needs to be unique"

    So, you're saying destructible terrain wasn't unique enough? They said themselves the map will be the most destructible and largest yet.

29. I'm kinda happy that they didn't make the Battle Royale announcement such a big deal with the marketing (and yeah the marketing was a failure itself, but thats not my point). By making the royale one of the "new main modes" that would be on launch, betraying bf fans that like classics like conquest. They just kinda tacked it on for later for those who might be interested, but isn't completely intrusive to the people that would rather play the classic modes.

30. Yes now this looks better

31. Weird flex but okay, FIRESTORM

32. Firestorm>blackout, pubg, maybe even fortnite for me. Change my mind