Thanks for saying the spoiler that actually mattered instead of the one you're revealed to instantly, which isn't a spoiler if it's revealed in "five minutes"
Was blown away by the graphics on 360 when this came out
Yeah but at least it set a good template for AC2 to knock outta the park. Look at the series now
everyone is entitled to their own opinion, i'm personally a huge fan of assassins creed. i can't beleive i've just watched this review in 2018, some 11 years later and there have been numerous sequels all of which i've played and thought they were awesome. in my eyes this is a very unfair review.
Sigh… Memories.
I don't get why people don't like all the AC games. Even Unity was great when Arno Dorian wasn't running around chasing Templar pussy.
2018???
Idc what anyone says about this game period. At the time this game was at its peak from combat to story and cities, this is where a great franchise was born and this was a good game to give off that expectation
Lol when he found out the so called second story that made no sense or wasn't important turns out to be the main story of the game..
yea i loved assassins creed and pretty sure there were assassins before when is it 1600s? americans what they know… he is american right :
Only problem I had with it was the repetitive side missions. Other than that for the 1st in its franchise it was pretty good. People who say this is the weakest in the franchise in terms of gameplay I would agree with. But isn’t that a good thing?
No I didn't see the shining
The 8 inch crap I just took has better quality than this video
It took me over 50 hours to complete it and worst of all I played it after ac2 ,ac brotherhood ,ac r , ac3
To be honest this game isnt as good as the other games, i have it on ps3 and doesnt have any trophies loved the sequels way more then the first game
I just read on twitter than this first Assassin's Creed is getting remastered for PS4 and Xbox one and PC ???❤??????
2017
10 seconds into review and u knw the review is a dick
You are wrong Bro. It was one of the best games of 2007.
I don't know what's a bigger joke. This review, or 144p.
Damn IGN really worked on their reviews
This guy must feel like an ass. Although some of the later series were a bit repetitive the 1st 5 were amazing. He got this review TOTALLY wrong
9 YEARS AGO!! JESUS I'M OLD!!
I wounder how stupid this guy feels today knowing this an amazing franchise that is still going today. he doesn't even sound professional at all. I guess back then ign just hired randoms with no type of experience to review games because he sounds like a 15 year old kid who just didn't care because it wasn't cod smh just ridiculous how horrible this guy reviewed this game
![CHENNAI SUPER KINGS VS MUMBAI INDIANS | IPL 2024 FULL MATCH AT WANKHEDE [CRICKET 22 HDR]](https://www.technewsfix.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/1713248359_maxresdefault-300x200.jpg)
Thanks for saying the spoiler that actually mattered instead of the one you're revealed to instantly, which isn't a spoiler if it's revealed in "five minutes"
Was blown away by the graphics on 360 when this came out
Yeah but at least it set a good template for AC2 to knock outta the park. Look at the series now
everyone is entitled to their own opinion, i'm personally a huge fan of assassins creed. i can't beleive i've just watched this review in 2018, some 11 years later and there have been numerous sequels all of which i've played and thought they were awesome. in my eyes this is a very unfair review.
Sigh… Memories.
I don't get why people don't like all the AC games. Even Unity was great when Arno Dorian wasn't running around chasing Templar pussy.
2018???
Idc what anyone says about this game period. At the time this game was at its peak from combat to story and cities, this is where a great franchise was born and this was a good game to give off that expectation
Lol when he found out the so called second story that made no sense or wasn't important turns out to be the main story of the game..
yea i loved assassins creed and pretty sure there were assassins before when is it 1600s? americans what they know… he is american right :
Only problem I had with it was the repetitive side missions. Other than that for the 1st in its franchise it was pretty good. People who say this is the weakest in the franchise in terms of gameplay I would agree with. But isn’t that a good thing?
No I didn't see the shining
The 8 inch crap I just took has better quality than this video
It took me over 50 hours to complete it and worst of all I played it after ac2 ,ac brotherhood ,ac r , ac3
To be honest this game isnt as good as the other games, i have it on ps3 and doesnt have any trophies loved the sequels way more then the first game
I just read on twitter than this first Assassin's Creed is getting remastered for PS4 and Xbox one and PC ???❤??????
2017
10 seconds into review and u knw the review is a dick
You are wrong Bro. It was one of the best games of 2007.
I don't know what's a bigger joke. This review, or 144p.
Damn IGN really worked on their reviews
This guy must feel like an ass. Although some of the later series were a bit repetitive the 1st 5 were amazing. He got this review TOTALLY wrong
9 YEARS AGO!! JESUS I'M OLD!!
I wounder how stupid this guy feels today knowing this an amazing franchise that is still going today. he doesn't even sound professional at all. I guess back then ign just hired randoms with no type of experience to review games because he sounds like a 15 year old kid who just didn't care because it wasn't cod smh just ridiculous how horrible this guy reviewed this game