Recommended For You

About the Author: IGN

21 Comments

  1. Why is this even a discussion, no one wants to see a Bloodborne Battle Royale. The genre isn't for everything. IGN is getting too cliche like who comes up with these ideas, what races through their mind? This week, let's see what type of Battle Royale players would enjoy. Let's pick out among popular fan favorite titles and linked them to a Battle Royale. While a hundred hunters waking up into a dream does sound enticing, how would the gameplay work, the atmosphere, it wouldn't be Bloodborne. You're acting like Battle Royale is the best and newest thing and no other game can be different, by linking it to franchises where it just wouldn't work nor does it spark any interest

  2. For Honor, but on a larger scale without npc enemies. Sorry, but not that original as this sounds though if it was done by From Software I might be interested.

  3. We of course aint gonna get one so I'm okay with just talking about the idea of it, like idk it would be a battle royal that would last for hours because of how slow paced the gameplay is and if you have over 60 people it would be really long, so yeah even if the game was gonna get one it wouldn't work with the gameplay it has

  4. I could barely survive through the game’s tutorial. A Bloodborne Battle Royale game sounds torturous to say the least.

  5. I like this idea cuz its different it's hard to wrap my head around it but I would like to see from software take a crack at it. It might finally make me like battle royal for ones or not but it is interesting to see.

  6. soulsborne games Melee combat is not enjoyable in pvp.
    i would play for honor if i want pvp melee combat.
    that game is focused on online gaming.

Leave a Reply