IGN Anti-Xbox Bias EXPOSED?!: Starfield Review 7/10

IGN Anti-Xbox Bias EXPOSED?!: Starfield Review 7/10



STARFIELD IGN REVIEW FACES ACCUSATIONS OF ANTI-XBOX BIAS FROM FANS. The reviews for Starfield are now out, and, …

source

Recommended For You

About the Author: 8BE

26 Comments

  1. I think the game gives you more than enough info on how to get to the next objective, so you don't have to constantly stare at a map. I never understood this complaint.

  2. Ign is a toss up it depends on the reviewer either they say something good or something really really stupid. That said on this game I am with them they pointed the lack of a map, the slow start and that a lot of areas are barren or boring, basically you have to go through a lot of hassle to reach the good stuff.

    Bethesda are the OG of open world but recent games have done a better job to make open worlds fun instead of tedious, but they have sticked to the old formula

  3. Most planets are empty,they should have give us a better content . 8 years for boring exploration. Sorry buy IGN here are kind to give a 7 .

    Would have give a 6/10 at best. Thank god its on gamepass.

  4. These PlayStation fans crying about Xbox acquiring Studios and IP to make them exclusive are the same ones that have applauded Sony for paying 3rd developers to make games exclusive that obviously should’ve been multi platform 🤷🏻‍♂️ The hypocrisy and double standards are next level. I see it the opposite if Xbox buys a studio and pays for the development of a game making it exclusive actually makes sense since it’s a 1st party studio and an IP they own but Sony simply seeing what an Independent studio is working on and writing a cheque for it not to release on Xbox is the anticompetitive BS. Remember Spiderman 2018 was developed and released by Insomniac when they weren’t a Sony 1st party studio 🤯 nobody seems to acknowledge it and knowing this obviously means every other Insomniac title before 2018 also could’ve been multiplat the same could be said for many games from many 3rd party studios Sony has been paying to release games exclusively for PlayStation for years. I don’t buy into the 2nd party BS since all it really means is they’ve been getting paid to make their creations exclusive for years without actually being aquired I also don’t consider that organic it’s more of a cheap cop out.

  5. I was unaware of Stapletons’s bias. It is very obvious, thanks for covering this. I like honest unbiased game reviews. Will not use IGN anymore.

  6. You all really need to stop whining whenever your games don’t get good scores.
    A few outlets gave this mediocre game a 7. IGN, GameSpot, Digital Trends, PC Gamer and PC GamesN. Many of you don’t want to accept the fact a game that was in development for several years expected to be the Series X golden child is a flop. Flop because of the expectations. It’s not a terrible game, but should’ve been better with the hype that surrounded it.

  7. I like the way ppl are just complaining about the empty planets in the game lol but wonder if they still complaining about it when they adventure on our planet lol…

  8. Honestly I think people worry way too much about these scores. I typically love your content but honestly so what if IGN rates it low? People always say scores matter or don't matter when it's convenient for them. Everyone has biases and the individual person who reviewed the game scored the game. They shouldn't feel pressure to line up with whatever the overall feeling is. People who gave it a 10, probably lots of them had pro-Xbox biases.

    This just seems like a silly thing to call out anyone for. We need to police opinions now?

    I love your channel and content but I don't like this train of thought.

Comments are closed.