We are bombarded with advertisements for managed fund (mutual fund) investments. They impl us us to entrust our hard earned cash to them with the promise that their expert managers will reward us with above average returns.
On the face of it managed funds do appear to offer benefits. They allow the less investor to diversify (and thus reduce risk) to a much greater degree than if they invested in individual stocks. A managed fund can spread an investment across 30 or more stocks where the small investor may be limited to just 2 or 3 by direct investment. And they should ensure that the stocks are being chosen by intelligent individuals with access to the latest and best information.
But all of this comes at a cost, ie the manager's commission.
And there's the rub. By the time the manager's fees are taken out the average returns do not beat the market average.
An example of this is reported by the UK Daily Mail (Oct 25, 2006) – "Research from independent advisors Bestinvest shows that over the past three years 73pc of actively managed funds investing in UK companies to increase the capital have failed to beat the FTSE All Share Index. "
As a further example, Clive Briat of the United Kingdom Financial Services Authority says: "Our research shows there is no evidence, on average, over time, that actively managed funds outperform tracker funds if you take into account the difference in charges between the two . " (The Mail on Sunday, Financial Mail, January 28, 2007)
Burton Malkiel's classic A Random Walk Down Wall Street describes academic analysis that says the same.
Of course there are star performers, but these may be explained by chance. Of all the gamblers playing the casino slots, some will (by chance) emerge as winners. It does not mean that they can repeat their success. That's why funds carry the wealth warning that past performance is no guarantee of future results!
Best way to achieve the benefits of diversification is through low-cost tracker funds or Exchange-traded funds (ETFs).