Recommended For You

About the Author: IGN

32 Comments

  1. dude this should've been a 6 to 7, it's a bit too simple enough but decent and fun enough, what do you mean bad to put it at 4? the price is a little steep for the length (casual gameplay).

  2. Remember when IGN gave the halfassed Cyberpunk release a 9/10 and now they bash a game made by a single dev… Youtube disabled dislikes to shield reviews like this.

  3. Looks like this game just needs more Evil Trains + train "sidecar" for multiplay with friends…..hell….have it online where you get to be the evil train chasing your friends with randomly assigned powers. Friends who die turn into ghost trains.

  4. Anton Ego : "In many ways, the work of a critic is easy. We risk very little, yet enjoy a position over those who offer up their work and their selves to our judgment. We thrive on negative criticism, which is fun to write and to read. But the bitter truth we critics must face, is that in the grand scheme of things, the average piece of junk is probably more meaningful than our criticism designating it so."

  5. Truly a vile, disgusting review. If you review a great triple A game and say it’s bad, at least you’re not singling out anyone. But you’ve taken a game made by one person, who put so much time and care into it, and tearing it apart AS THOUGH it is a triple A game. Either you didn’t know it was made by one person, or you did and still approached your review in this way regardless; I’m not sure which is worse.

Comments are closed.