Call Of Duty: WWII Review

27 Comments

1. More war maps, please.

2. Interactive movie campaign won’t appeal to everyone but at least the servers have settled down. The price has dropped off a cliff so you’ve less to loose if you have six hours to spare or even longer if you hop on line.

3. FUCK THE LOOT BOX SYSTEM IN WW2 AND FUCK EA!

4. Tryed the single player because i was bored with the mp… it’s one of the worst ones of the series! So much bullshit glitches and veteran is broken! I played all single players since cod4 on veteran with no problem but this one got me raging and not want to play it anymore…

5. Sad day when you realize you can no longer trust reviews from IGN and Gamespot.

6. I'd be fair and give it a 7 out of 10. I just bought the game, and So far the campaign is pretty good. I like how they deviated from all the fancy technology, such as the jet packs and running on walls.

7. I can’t believe people can’t expect the fact ww2 is actually a decent cod game

8. This is guy is cherry picking all the good stuff about cod ww2. And not talking about the huge pile of shit in this game. He is bias

9. Womans and blacks at nazi army?

10. Reminds me of the first ever medal of honour….seriously boring maps and guns and tacky gameplay…they have taken all the fun out the game what’s happened! they just don’t seem to add anything extra ever!

11. SELLOUT REVIEW PAID FOR BY CALL OF DUTY.

    i sold this game 2 days after buying it, its the most meh cod since every single one before it.

12. Wait until Battlefield V (ww2) version comes out!

13. I’ll only pay 10.00 for this game , I bought Titian fall 2 instead , cod ww2 is a game from 2009 it feels like .

14. This game is good. I've tried this on my friend's PS4. I get used to the servers.

15. No where near 9/10 I'd give it 7.5/10 as zombies is by far worse than any other zombies in COD history. Multiplayer is alright need more mp maps though and the campaign is good but took me 2 days to complete

16. 9 suberb hahhhhhaaaaaahhhhaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhaaaaaa

17. Now we need Call of Duty Vietnam

18. There's not even a HINT of criticism in this ad-view. I'm already avoiding IGN for this reason and unfortunately Gamespot is now in that category too. The game review business is so deep in the pocket of developers, that it is now an open secret. Corruption of journalism to the core.

19. Another attempt to brown wash a historical setting. Whats next, african american medieval knights? Lets remember that african americans generally weren't allowed to fight. Dont cover up the ugly parts of our past or we are doomed to repeat them!

20. Another attempt to brown wash a historical setting. Whats next, african american medieval knights? Lets remember that african americans generally weren't allowed to fight. Dont cover up the ugly parts of our past or we are doomed to repeat them!

21. A 9/10 for this? I knew you fucks were sponsored by activison.

22. THE GAME SUCKS

23. Sorry but, am I the only person who thinks the main characters are very cliche? I feel like I’ve seen those same personalities, characters, etc a million times before.

24. Good review.

25. I love how he tries to make the game sound good ..and… now, I love how there's 2k comments saying the same thing as me ???

26. They must have paid them alot of money to give there game a good review. I would give it a 5/10. I played for a month nd went back to bf1.

27. man… it seems like the HISTORY is CHANGED for the sake of FILTH PROPAGANDA — so SAD