Samsung has an unblur feature too, never knew it was this big of a deal
People complaining about the price's will be happy when when the base model is $100 more next year. No the Pro isn't even close to $300 more of a phone but people who want the pro won't be looking at the seven for anything but size for the most part. Screen, battery and camera are literally most valued parts of a smartphone.
I think the selfie feature could also be useful for guys like me who don't know how to take a good selfie
I will say, its just a promotion right now, but I'm trading in my Samsung s20 for a pixel 7pro, and they are exchanging it pretty much outright and all I got to pay is the taxes. Wouldnt be able to do that if I went to a 22 ultra
Latley I don't really trust MKBHD on a lot of technical stuff on his reviews but this is the last straw 2nd time he doesn't know that the Pixel 7 has a 90hz display. I mean, bro, since the Pixel 4 they have those, why would they go 60?!
The pro is really only $200 more if you buy it now through Amazon, or Best Buy and a few others because of the 200 in credit you get on the pro and $100 on the non pro. That helps make the 7pro a easier buy
I didn't know Deryck from Sum 41 did phone reviews đ
You are pretty bad at math aren't you? đ¤Ŗ 3840×2160 is 8.3MP. My old S10 had 10MP front camera and had 4k on it!
I wonder with all of the experience Google has gained from computational photography, might they be a competitor to Adobe in the future? I ask because most of these photo enhancement features have been available for some time on desktop with Photoshop and Lightroom, but Google is making it one-touch instead of having to learn complicated image editing software. Of course Adobe products will have the fine-tune controls, but for the majority of people, will Google be the "good enough" alternative?
The guy on the left talks like a 80s valley girl lol
Samsung had object eraser and photo remaster well before Google.
I wish telephoto were the default second lens. I've always found way more use cases for telephoto than wide-angle. Maybe that's just me. But spending $300 more to get my preferred second lens is a huge ask.
Nice. Can't wait to deblur pictures of Bigfoot and the Loch Ness Monster and finally prove that they exist.
LOL did this man say " … if you make it" about his grandma!??!!!
Love the outro lol
I will prefer smaller display 6 inch for handy but having pro features which is lacking in Android phone except samsung s22 still not upto mark as quality..this is a space where andoid brand have to focus to compete iPhone which is small ,handy and have quality performance with specifications.
Can't decide on color. Went with hazel but worried color too bright. Black is too gray
MKBHD is most ignorant Tech Reviewer I have come across. He hypes up every basic thing related to Apple or Google which others are doing for years. Bro, the Photo Unblur using AI feature is already present in Oppo Phones and even has a app named Remini on Playstore. Similarly the Magic Eraser feature was already present on Samsung, Xiaomi and probably other phones too and has apps like MintAI and Retouch on Playstore. Same for the Colorize feature you desire in upcoming Pixels, that can be achieved using apps like Colorize and MintAI.
Is 7 locked at 90 Hz? Or can it go down, Google website suggests it does.
In Euro prices the phones are at 650âŦ vs. 900âŦ for the pro. I think this price difference is a lot more reasonable.
Glass visor caused a lot of lens flare in the pixel 6. The metal one should help.
"Grandma, that's going to be your birthday present….if you'll make it " 11:30
David Imel thinks the price difference between the 7 and 7 Pro is too wide, he wants the 7 Pro priced at $799. MKBHD and David have no issue with the S22 Ultra being more than $300-400 more than the S22 and even the S22+. $1000 phones are the norm, its seems with LG's departure the Pixel is the new punching bag. Tech Community live on another planet.
I'm getting the Pro because of: Telephoto lens Macro QHD+ Display 120 Hz LTPO Screen Size Extra RAM
I still think that the right thing to do is to stop obsessing over face unlock and push companies towards perfecting fingerprint scanners. When implemented right, fingerprint is much faster and much more convenient. I miss my device being unlocked by the time I pull it out of my pocket. Apple's logo at the rear could be repurposed to be a hardware scanner. Or better, just make the power button double down to also have fingerprint scanner – in both android and iOS worlds.
7 pro pre ordered in hazel đ hyped to test it and compare to my s22 ultra
The Hazel color on the Pro is one the best looking color schemes Iâve seen on a phone thatâs really made me want it more.
5:55 did you just called the pixel a iphone??! Shame on you! Lol
Speaker labels will be an awesome feature if you do interviews. Being able to know who is saying what as it transcribes the interview is so killer.
Poor Adam…
I don't know why you guys keep wharfing on about the fact that the Pixel 7 Pro isn't worth it for $300 more than the Pixel 7. In my opinion, the price is absolutely justified. Look at the differences between them.
to be fair I had face-unlock on jellybean but I turned it off because I liked looking at my lockscreen
I sent my 6A back because the 4/5G was hopeless. When you review this please comment.
Zooming by cropping does not change the perspective. This is not a replacement for a proper camera.
I really wish they gave us Lemongrass in the 7Pro but I'm still hype for it. Probably gonna get Hazel
Fun update – I found a Made by Google podcast on my PocketCasts discover page today. And the first episode was about smartphone cameras. It wasn't super high level or anything, but I really liked it
there's no way they can't run those photo unblur algorithms on processors other than tensor. artificial lock in being presented as hardware limitation is disingenuous af.
Google: âletâs copy the front facing camera layout with the âiâ cutout. Just like we did with the rear camera layout a few years ago so it looks like an iPhone layout but on the back instead of the frontâ
Apple released iPhone 14 Pro and Pro Max showing it was just the camera housing and blacked out with the pixels turned off
Google: âdamnit. Now we need to insult them with features we have had for a while that Apple just released THEN announce new features to Pixel that has been around for 3 years in iPhones. We need to be more like Samsungâ
Did Marques get braces or something? Can hear some lisping
"no photos will ever be blurry ever again" – app gets released for creative "retro" blurring. MARK MY WORDS lol
The cloud TPU is very different from Edge TPU. The requirements for developing a deep learning model like unblur for the edge TPU on Pixels are very different from the requirements for cloud TPU. The major difference is that the cloud TPU has more compute and power so it is easy to run models in real-time whereas the edge TPUs are generally much smaller and needs to prioritize efficiency. Therefore, a model for edge TPU will not always work out of the box for the cloud TPU. With that said, typically we would start with a cloud TPU or GPU model, and then downsize it to fit edge TPU or Ml accelerators for real-time processing at the cost of accuracy. If Google follow the same pattern, they should be able to deploy the unblur model for cloud TPU within a few months. There is also the cost for running deep learning models in the cloud. Google will need to justify the extra cost for running cloud TPU.
That's not it. the pro has a Quad HD Display
Samsung has an unblur feature too, never knew it was this big of a deal
People complaining about the price's will be happy when when the base model is $100 more next year. No the Pro isn't even close to $300 more of a phone but people who want the pro won't be looking at the seven for anything but size for the most part. Screen, battery and camera are literally most valued parts of a smartphone.
I think the selfie feature could also be useful for guys like me who don't know how to take a good selfie
I will say, its just a promotion right now, but I'm trading in my Samsung s20 for a pixel 7pro, and they are exchanging it pretty much outright and all I got to pay is the taxes. Wouldnt be able to do that if I went to a 22 ultra
Latley I don't really trust MKBHD on a lot of technical stuff on his reviews but this is the last straw
2nd time he doesn't know that the Pixel 7 has a 90hz display. I mean, bro, since the Pixel 4 they have those, why would they go 60?!
The pro is really only $200 more if you buy it now through Amazon, or Best Buy and a few others because of the 200 in credit you get on the pro and $100 on the non pro. That helps make the 7pro a easier buy
I didn't know Deryck from Sum 41 did phone reviews đ
You are pretty bad at math aren't you? đ¤Ŗ 3840×2160 is 8.3MP.
My old S10 had 10MP front camera and had 4k on it!
I wonder with all of the experience Google has gained from computational photography, might they be a competitor to Adobe in the future? I ask because most of these photo enhancement features have been available for some time on desktop with Photoshop and Lightroom, but Google is making it one-touch instead of having to learn complicated image editing software. Of course Adobe products will have the fine-tune controls, but for the majority of people, will Google be the "good enough" alternative?
The guy on the left talks like a 80s valley girl lol
Samsung had object eraser and photo remaster well before Google.
I wish telephoto were the default second lens. I've always found way more use cases for telephoto than wide-angle. Maybe that's just me. But spending $300 more to get my preferred second lens is a huge ask.
Nice. Can't wait to deblur pictures of Bigfoot and the Loch Ness Monster and finally prove that they exist.
LOL did this man say " … if you make it" about his grandma!??!!!
Love the outro lol
I will prefer smaller display 6 inch for handy but having pro features which is lacking in Android phone except samsung s22 still not upto mark as quality..this is a space where andoid brand have to focus to compete iPhone which is small ,handy and have quality performance with specifications.
Can't decide on color. Went with hazel but worried color too bright. Black is too gray
MKBHD is most ignorant Tech Reviewer I have come across. He hypes up every basic thing related to Apple or Google which others are doing for years. Bro, the Photo Unblur using AI feature is already present in Oppo Phones and even has a app named Remini on Playstore. Similarly the Magic Eraser feature was already present on Samsung, Xiaomi and probably other phones too and has apps like MintAI and Retouch on Playstore. Same for the Colorize feature you desire in upcoming Pixels, that can be achieved using apps like Colorize and MintAI.
Is 7 locked at 90 Hz? Or can it go down, Google website suggests it does.
In Euro prices the phones are at 650âŦ vs. 900âŦ for the pro. I think this price difference is a lot more reasonable.
Glass visor caused a lot of lens flare in the pixel 6. The metal one should help.
"Grandma, that's going to be your birthday present….if you'll make it " 11:30
David Imel thinks the price difference between the 7 and 7 Pro is too wide, he wants the 7 Pro priced at $799.
MKBHD and David have no issue with the S22 Ultra being more than $300-400 more than the S22 and even the S22+. $1000 phones are the norm, its seems with LG's departure the Pixel is the new punching bag.
Tech Community live on another planet.
I'm getting the Pro because of:
Telephoto lens
Macro
QHD+ Display
120 Hz LTPO
Screen Size
Extra RAM
I still think that the right thing to do is to stop obsessing over face unlock and push companies towards perfecting fingerprint scanners. When implemented right, fingerprint is much faster and much more convenient. I miss my device being unlocked by the time I pull it out of my pocket. Apple's logo at the rear could be repurposed to be a hardware scanner. Or better, just make the power button double down to also have fingerprint scanner – in both android and iOS worlds.
7 pro pre ordered in hazel đ hyped to test it and compare to my s22 ultra
The Hazel color on the Pro is one the best looking color schemes Iâve seen on a phone thatâs really made me want it more.
5:55 did you just called the pixel a iphone??! Shame on you! Lol
Speaker labels will be an awesome feature if you do interviews. Being able to know who is saying what as it transcribes the interview is so killer.
Poor Adam…
I don't know why you guys keep wharfing on about the fact that the Pixel 7 Pro isn't worth it for $300 more than the Pixel 7. In my opinion, the price is absolutely justified. Look at the differences between them.
Pixel 7 -$599
âĸ 6.3" screen
âĸ 1080p
âĸ 90 Hz
âĸ Flat
âĸ 1400 nits
âĸ Rigid AMOLED
âĸ 8gb RAM
âĸ 4300 mAh battery
âĸ Only Sub-6 5G
âĸ matte frame
Pixel 7 Pro – $899
âĸ 6.7" screen
âĸ1440p
âĸ Curved
âĸ120 Hz
âĸ LTPO
âĸ 1500 nits
âĸ Flexible AMOLED
âĸ 12 GB ram
âĸ 5000 mAh battery
âĸ UWB conndctivity
âĸ Sub-6 and mmWave 5G
âĸ Improved Ultrawide with Autofocus
âĸ Extra Periscope 5x Telephoto
âĸ Glossy frame
to be fair I had face-unlock on jellybean but I turned it off because I liked looking at my lockscreen
I sent my 6A back because the 4/5G was hopeless. When you review this please comment.
Zooming by cropping does not change the perspective. This is not a replacement for a proper camera.
I really wish they gave us Lemongrass in the 7Pro but I'm still hype for it. Probably gonna get Hazel
Fun update – I found a Made by Google podcast on my PocketCasts discover page today. And the first episode was about smartphone cameras. It wasn't super high level or anything, but I really liked it
there's no way they can't run those photo unblur algorithms on processors other than tensor. artificial lock in being presented as hardware limitation is disingenuous af.
Google: âletâs copy the front facing camera layout with the âiâ cutout. Just like we did with the rear camera layout a few years ago so it looks like an iPhone layout but on the back instead of the frontâ
Apple released iPhone 14 Pro and Pro Max showing it was just the camera housing and blacked out with the pixels turned off
Google: âdamnit. Now we need to insult them with features we have had for a while that Apple just released THEN announce new features to Pixel that has been around for 3 years in iPhones. We need to be more like Samsungâ
Did Marques get braces or something? Can hear some lisping
"no photos will ever be blurry ever again" – app gets released for creative "retro" blurring. MARK MY WORDS lol
The cloud TPU is very different from Edge TPU. The requirements for developing a deep learning model like unblur for the edge TPU on Pixels are very different from the requirements for cloud TPU. The major difference is that the cloud TPU has more compute and power so it is easy to run models in real-time whereas the edge TPUs are generally much smaller and needs to prioritize efficiency. Therefore, a model for edge TPU will not always work out of the box for the cloud TPU. With that said, typically we would start with a cloud TPU or GPU model, and then downsize it to fit edge TPU or Ml accelerators for real-time processing at the cost of accuracy. If Google follow the same pattern, they should be able to deploy the unblur model for cloud TPU within a few months. There is also the cost for running deep learning models in the cloud. Google will need to justify the extra cost for running cloud TPU.