5 "As Seen On TV" Gadgets Tested By Design Expert | Well Equipped | Epicurious

5 "As Seen On TV" Gadgets Tested By Design Expert | Well Equipped | Epicurious



Design and usability guru Dan Formosa returns to evaluate and improve upon 5 gadgets you may have seen advertised on a …

source

Recommended For You

About the Author: Epicurious

35 Comments

  1. every gadget you tried was made of like the cheapest most-unknown source-plastic-material that i would not want to touch the food i eat.

    0/10 for all of these. get your grandmas old kitchen tools instead.

  2. When testing a gadget, 2 other things should be taken into consideration. 1 setup time. 2 cleanup time. Barring dexterity, you be better off using the meat mallet; rather than the machine.

  3. For the final product he basically gave the bristle gloves a 25 second advantage, he started with the bristle gloves already on and it STILL lost by a second

  4. I guess Mr. Tenderizer would probably be better than a mallet if strength was an issue, or if a person were to get fatigued easily.

  5. I donā€™t have a problem with a rubber glove-scrubber mix, but itā€™s be so much better if the bristles were much shorter, much softer, and had more surface area like all the way down the fingers onto the pad of the hand. Maybe not the palm, maybe yes the palm, Iā€™m not sure.

  6. The curler dog has one big advantage and it's that you don't have to deal with a knife. That means little kids could use it or people with shaking hands.

  7. For the burger I press I would have preferred to see it done with real meat not artificial plant meat. I'm sure the oils and fats food have different interactions with the press then the plant.

  8. Gloves were not a fair compairson in terms of which is faster, due to the timer being started while the gloves on the right were being put on but the left ones were already on…

Comments are closed.